@thej but 3 years is a joke.. They say he was the most violent of the lot. They should reconsider the age of Juvenile. 15 is more reasonable
@thej also the point of justice is to set example.. If an 17 year old can get away with such crime. How would other his age fear the law?
@thej but 3 years is a joke.. They say he was the most violent of the lot. They should reconsider the age of Juvenile. 15 is more reasonable
@thej also the point of justice is to set example.. If an 17 year old can get away with such crime. How would other his age fear the law?