sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli c… Posted on June 8, 2015 by twitter sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
@thej @pranesh_prakash Claim is on IP violation? IMO personal rights & privacy takes precedence over IP. There could be more caveats to help
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
@thej if you also happen to discover that this firm modified your data while fetching it, then you have a strong defence! @pranesh_prakash
@njnrn @thej I’m not sure about those defences, but here are some from the Copyright Act: https://t.co/16sBvfZhrq
@pranesh_prakash that’s reasonable. Guess, copyright laws cover IPR too? But until we see full text of C&D notice, can’t speculate @thej
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
@thej Please don’t take it down. You can respond to the letter. I don’t think you’ve done anything wrong. @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
@thej @pranesh_prakash Claim is on IP violation? IMO personal rights & privacy takes precedence over IP. There could be more caveats to help
@thej @pranesh_prakash though I should declare ‘I’m not a lawyer!’ :)
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
@thej if you also happen to discover that this firm modified your data while fetching it, then you have a strong defence! @pranesh_prakash
@njnrn @thej I’m not sure about those defences, but here are some from the Copyright Act: https://t.co/16sBvfZhrq
@pranesh_prakash that’s reasonable. Guess, copyright laws cover IPR too? But until we see full text of C&D notice, can’t speculate @thej
@njnrn This is an area of my specialization :) @thej
@pranesh_prakash exactly the reason I cc’ed you on first tweet! :) @thej
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
@thej @njnrn @pranesh_prakash show us a copy of the letter, please
@thej @njnrn @pranesh_prakash I hope we can fight them. I’d be happy to pitch in with some support.
@thej Please don’t take it down. You can respond to the letter. I don’t think you’ve done anything wrong. @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash
RT @thej: sent by advocates in mumbai representing Israeli company who wrote that piece of JS @njnrn @pranesh_prakash